Post by ian83 on Dec 20, 2007 0:25:44 GMT -5
An Informed Consensus:
An Essay on the Proper Usage of the Word ‘Jew’
By Pastor Eli James
The Nature of the Problem
Christian Israel has a problem. The problem is one of Identity. For those who are new to this message, it is clear to us that the Jewish people are impostors to the claim of being Israel. Of this there is no doubt. The problem is who exactly is a Jew and how do we define the word ‘Jew’ so as to include the correct categories of people and to exclude the wrong categories of people.
Our problem is twofold: First is the problem of definition. The second is the problem of perception. We need to get clear on what the definition is and then we need to understand how perceptions have blurred or obscured the proper definition. Only a thorough analysis of the historical, racial and religious differences between Judahites versus Jews and, also, Israelites versus Jews can give us the answer. The novice will say that there is no difference between Jews and Israelites. That is the opinion of the parrot that has been trained by the rabbis and the Judeo-Christian Pharisees, such as Falwell, Hagee, Robertson and others, who teach lies and who make a living by blurring true distinctions so that criminals can pose as saints.
The point of this essay will be to suggest a proper usage of the word ‘Jew’ which accurately distinguishes between what they say they are and what they truly are. For example, the Jews say they are "Semites," but they have falsely labeled themselves as such, while the real Shemites, the Anglo-Saxon, Celtic and Caucasians of the European Dispersion, do not even realize that they are Shemites. One of our problems is that the Jews themselves are evasive and elusive about who or what a Jew is. Some say a Jew is a member of a particular race, namely, that of Shem. But this suggestion is easily disproven by two racial facts: 1.) Jews are virtually all of mixed race, especially the Ashkenazi Jews who actually have no Shemitic blood in them at all; and 2.) there are many other ethnic groups, such as Arabs, Palestinians, Turks, etc., who, like the Jewish people, are of partially Shemitic heritage. Many of these groups actually have more Shemitic blood in their veins than do the Jews. The only point of agreement among Jews here is that one must have a Jewish mother in order to be born a Jew, but that begs the question of her racial origins as well. Few Christians bother to point out that there is a major discrepancy between this Jewish maternal rule and the Biblical reckoning of lineage through the father. Where is the Scripture that allows this change in doctrine?
Now, since the Jewish claim to the land of Palestine is based on their supposed "Semitic" heritage, then virtually all the peoples of the Middle East have just as much right to Palestine as they do. If, on the other hand, the Jewish claim on Palestine is due to their supposed stewardship of the Bible, then the Jews are equally unacceptable because the Jewish people, despite their claims, have NEVER practiced the laws of the Bible. They have always practiced their own version of Scripture. It is today known as the Talmud. The rabbis make no distinction between the Torah (the Law and History Books of Moses) and the Talmud (rabbinical commentaries that carry as much or more weight for Jews than the writings of Moses). Few Christians are even aware of the Talmud and the Talmud’s frequent contradiction of the Mosaic Law.
Some Jews say that to be Jewish you only have to belong to or ascribe to a certain religious point of view: Judaism. But there are Orthodox, Conservative, Liberal, Hasidic, and other types of religious Jews who disagree among themselves what constitutes a religious Jew. Others say that you can be a "spiritual Jew" by merely sympathizing with whatever a particular Jew says. As can be seen, there is no real agreement even among Jews as to what the definition of the Jew is. But this vagueness is a deliberate tactic employed by the rabbis so that they can be evasive about their origins and still claim to possess the heritage of Israel and Judah.
But rather than try to sort through what the Jews say about themselves, there is a much easier way to determine what a Jew is; and that is by comparing the Jewish people, both in terms of their racial make-up and their religious beliefs, to the Judahites of Scripture. What we will discover is that the Jews have deliberately obfuscated their racial and religious origins in order to impersonate the REAL Judahites and the REAL Israelites of Scripture. That they have succeeded in fooling the entire world into believing that they are the People of the Book is the fulfillment of the prophecy in the Book of Revelation that says they are "the beast that deceiveth the whole world." (Rev. 12:9) Also, Rev. 2:9 and 3:9, properly translated, reveal that there is an active impersonation going on. Those passages should read "those who say they are Judah but are not." Has there ever been anyone out there saying "I’m a Jew" who really isn’t? The fact is that non-Jews, except for Hollywood actors looking for work, have no desire whatsoever to call themselves "Jews." No one is trying to impersonate a Jew. It’s the Jews who are impersonating Judah.
We all have heard stories about identity theft; and these stories always involve a crook stealing the identity of another individual. This is an easy thing to do these days. It is incomprehensible to most Bible students that one people can impersonate another people, but this is exactly what the Jews have done. They have successfully passed themselves off as Israelites and Judahites when they are really the Synagogue of Satan, i.e., "wolves in sheep’s clothing".
Before proceeding with the Biblical analysis of the word ‘Jew,’ it is important that we state a modern definition of Jewry, so that we have a basis of comparison between who and what the Jews are today versus what they claim to have been. My argument is that the Jewish people have not changed at all since the days of the Scribes and Pharisees. This is saying a lot, because I believe it is true that the Jewish people, of all races and cultures on the face of the earth, have not evolved one iota in the last two thousand years. They are today just as barbaric a people as they were then; and I’m NOT referring to the people of the House of Judah nor the people of the House of Israel. These latter two groups have indeed evolved greatly, having been a blessing to all the world, with our technological inventions, agriculture, science, art, medicine, sanitation, architecture, music and religion. I am, of course, referring to Anglo-Saxon Israel, the True and Only descendants of the Twelve Tribes of Israel, which EXCLUDES the impostor Jews, who were never of either House, although they claim to be. But if you expect anything other than lies from the synagogue of Satan, then you will be fooled indeed.
I think a modern, fair and accurate definition of ‘Jew’ is this: "A person who is a member of the ethnic group whose religion is Judaism." Of course, this definition leaves open whether the individual is religiously pious or atheistic. The key to understanding who a Jew is is to understand their intense ethnic exclusiveness/chauvinism based on 1.) their religion and 2.) their self-perception as an exclusive group. In addition, the popular perception is that the Jews are of Judah and Israel. That is a false perception. That is why I did not include it in the definition. Somehow, our language must be made to conform to reality. This means that we must disabuse ourselves of the traditional association between Jewry and Judah. We must stop thinking as the rabbis have programmed us to think. We need to come up with our own language and our own definitions of words that conform to reality. Accomplishing this will get us out from under the psychological yoke that Esau/Jewry has imposed upon us as prophesied by Isaac in Gen. 27:40. As Jacob posed as Esau before Isaac, Esau is today posing as Jacob. As long as Esau gets away with posing as Judah and Israel, the world is under their spell. As my colleague Arnold Kennedy put it: "Our enemies are determined to continue with the greatest hoax of identity fraud in history." This spell must be broken.
Words As Weapons
Just because a word is seen in Scripture does not mean that it belongs there. There are other words, such as ‘Gentile,’ that don’t belong in Scripture either. It has been in the interest of Jewry to invent and use these words in order to convey the impression that the Bible is about them when, in fact, they are not God’s chosen people at all. Strong’s Concordance carries out this mythology by providing us with Jewish definitions of certain words. These Jewish definitions of words must be exposed as self-serving attempts to cloud the racially exclusive message of the Bible, namely, that the Bible is to, for, by and about only True Israel. The Law and the Covenants were given exclusively to Israel, not to the Jews. And the Covenants were never transferred from Israel to "the Church," as the Dispensationalists claim. The Covenants were never given to anyone but Israel. The Bible says that Israel would be known by a "new name" and that we would be Yahweh’s witnesses. The Jews have come to witness only for themselves, as their Talmud and their Mishnah attest. It is only White Christian Israel that has witnessed the Scriptures to the world. We are the ones who printed the Bible in over four hundred languages and preached the Gospel, both Old and New Testaments, to the world. The Jews have done no such thing. The extent of their teaching is that they claim that the Torah was delivered to them for safekeeping; but they have not done that either. They have tampered with it and they have defiled it. Jewish teaching on Scripture is a carefully guarded secret except for their self-praising soundbytes of false information. To find out what their religion actually teaches, you have to read the Talmud, which is their substitute for the Bible.
When was the first or the last time you heard a rabbi expounding on Scripture for the benefit of the masses? When have you ever heard a rabbi teaching the world about the Covenants made exclusively to Israel? It has never happened. They have NOT been God’s witnesses. By their fruits, they actually witness for another god entirely. They cannot afford to go into Biblical expositions because there is so little about them in Scripture, unless, of course, you start to study Esau. In fact, the rabbis have ceased general proselytizing for fear that too many non-Jews will wake up to their charade. Hence, the numbers of Jews have remained small because you can only entrust so many people with such gigantic lies. The few Jews (Koestler, Lilienthal, Freedman, f*gan, Roth, Bernstein, and others) who speak the truth about the Jewish Impersonation of Israel routinely get shouted down, excommunicated or liquidated.
One of the words the Jews use as a weapon against us is ‘nation.’ In the Hebrew, it comes from the word ‘goy.’ In the Greek, it comes from the word ‘ethnos’ and from the word ‘Hellene.’ The rabbis of Judaism have conditioned us to use the word ‘goyim’ to mean "non-Jews." This is an ABSOLUTELY FALSE definition, even though that’s how Strong’s Concordance defines it.
If the word ‘goyim’ means "non-Jews," then how do you explain Gen. 17:5? It says,
"Neither shall thy name be anymore called Abram, but thy name shall be Abraham; for a father of many nations have I made thee."
Now, the word here translated as "nations" is ‘goyim.’ As such it is correctly translated. But let’s apply the Jewish definition of the word and see how senseless their definition really is!
"for a father of many non-Jews have I made thee."
By selectively translating ‘goyim’ as either "nations" or "non-Jews," the rabbis of deception accomplish their Babylonian purpose: confusion. By their own self-serving definition, which suits them well in most cases where they wish to impersonate Israel, in this case it fails to include Jews as being among the nations of Abraham!!!! This is an oversight that their deception has failed to take note of. And this is why the verse is correctly translated in the KJV. Since Abraham was not a Jew in the first place, and since the Ishmaelites, Brahmins, Israelites and Saxons came from his loins, he was indeed, "the father of many nations." And, indeed, these are all "non-Jewish" nations. But is this what they want the Bible to say? Clearly, their definition of ‘goyim’ is ridiculous. The correct translation of ‘goyim’ is "nations." And, depending upon the context of the specific verse, ‘goyim’ can refer to Israelite nations or non-Israelite nations. By paying James Strong to redefine ‘goyim’ as meaning "non-Jewish," they have tampered with Scripture in order to promote themselves as the people of the Book.
To suit their own aims, they have inserted ‘non-Jews’ in place of ‘goyim;’ and this is a major deception.
Another word they use to fool us is ‘Gentiles.’
For the word ‘Gentile’ (from the Greek #1672), here is what Strong would have us believe: "… a Hellen (Grecian) or inhabitant of Hellas; by extension a Greek-speaking person, especially a non-Jew: -- Gentile, Greek."
Now, I contend that this word, ‘Gentile,’ is another candidate for the scrapheap, because it simply does not mean what the Jews or their apologists say it means. That fact is that most of the Greek-speaking world at the time of the writing of the New Testament were the Israelites of the Dispersion. As I was researching my book, The Great Inpersonation, I opened the Book of James, reading it with a critical eye for the first time. My jaw dropped! I even cried because I realized the significance of it right away. The Book of James opens with this statement: "To the Twelve Tribes scattered abroad, greetings."
Strong’s definition of ‘Gentile’ gives us the same logical problem as the word ‘goyim.’ Because Israelites and Jews have been falsely equated in our minds, a rabbi or a Judeo-Christian would insist that these "Greeks" are non-Israelite "Gentiles"! But the Apostle James clearly addresses them as the Twelve Tribes! There is no mistake in the Book of James. There were no Jews among those Dispersed Tribes, only Israelites! The mistake is in the false equation! – and in the false definitions! The fact is that the word ‘Gentiles’ rarely refers to non-Israelites. The word ‘Gentile’ really means – are you ready, folks? – a RACE, or a TRIBE. This is from the Greek word, ‘ethnos.’ (Strong’s 1484.) For this word, Strong pulls the same nonsense, adding interpolations such as "…specifically a foreign (non-Jewish) one (usually by implication pagan): -- Gentile, heathen, nation, people."
Ladies and gentlemen, Strong has done an abominably dirty deed. He has replaced antonyms for synonyms, opposites for equalities. This is deception, plain and simple. It’s the Jews who are, in fact, the heathen and the pagans, for they are history’s most blatant impostors to the name of Israel! By juxtaposing the word ‘Jew’ with ‘Israel’ and ‘Judah,’ and by likewise suggesting that ‘heathen’ and ‘pagan’ are the opposite of ‘Jew,’ the world has been quite thoroughly deceived! [By the way, it has come to my attention that the more recent printings of Strong’s Concordance differ from my old, 1970’s edition. There is no doubt in my mind that the newer versions have even more pro-Jewish interpolations than the older ones. It is possible that James Strong did not author these interpolations at all. Later editors could have inserted these pro-Jewish notes. The Jews are constantly rewriting history to praise themselves and to make Christendom look shallow.]
If you will simply read your Bible, you will find that ‘ethnos,’ depending upon the context, can mean an Israelite nation, a non-Israelite nation, or both lumped together, as in all nations. It NEVER has the specific meaning of "non-Jewish." That is a BOLD-FACED LIE! It is a Satanic interpolation of the most clever kind! Strong’s first two definitions, namely "race" and "tribe," are the correct definitions. All the Jew-business added afterwards is trickery. Again, organized Christian scholarship is either in complete ignorance of this fact or they are accepting payment for shoveling this lie around like so much pig manure! These pulpitmasters should be wearing dungarees, folks! – and their props should be pitchforks, not Bibles and podiums, for all the truth you are getting from them!
There is something wrong with the definition, especially the part that gratuitously adds "especially a non-Jew." That part of the definition is an interpolation, that is, a Satanically-inspired, Jewish lie! It is not true that all "Gentiles" are non-Israelites. It is true, however, that almost all Israelites are non-Jews! So, Strong and the Jews have shot themselves in the foot again, because when the New Testament refers to the Gentiles of the Dispersion, it is most definitely referring to non-Jewish Israelites! Of course, no rabbi will admit that there is such a thing. They have taught for centuries that the House of Israel, i.e., the "lost Ten Tribes," have totally disappeared from the pages of history, never to be found again.
Au contraire! Pardon my French! Add another false teaching to their list of thousands upon thousands of lies! Truly, Judaism is the religion of lies, and Jewry is the Synagogue of Satan, for by their simple use of deceptive words, they have almost managed to destroy the True Israel of Scripture! Truly did Hosea say, "My people are destroyed for lack of knowledge." (Hos. 4:6)
Dispensationalism and Replacement Theology
One of the most common mistakes of Judeo-Christianity is the doctrine called Dispensationalism. Dispensationalism teaches that the Jewish people, by having rejected the Messiah, forfeited their right to the New Covenant and, as a result, the New Covenant was given to the "Gentile" (meaning "non-Jewish," of course) Christian Church instead. So, they refer to the Old Testament as the "Jewish Dispensation" and the New Testament as the "Church Dispensation."
This doctrine is completely unscriptural nonsense. There is not a single thread of truth contained in it. Even most Jews reject this theory, calling it "Replacement Theology," because it dictates that the Jewish people were replaced by the Church. Well, both groups are completely wrong because the Jewish people never were, are not now, and never will be Israel. Their heritage is distinctly Edomite, not Judahite. Since the Jewish claim to the name of Israel is a historical lie, they were never the people of the Covenant. Having never possessed the Covenant, how can the Covenant be transmitted from them to some church?
The truth is that True Israel, the Anglo-Saxon, Celtic and Caucasian peoples of this planet, ARE the Covenant People. The Law and the Covenants were delivered EXCLUSIVELY to us and to NO ONE ELSE. Thus, we have always possessed the Covenants and we never gave them to the Jews or to some church, although the Jews are doing their best to get us to GIVE AWAY OUR INHERITANCE. If we are stupid enough to do this, then the Jews deserve it.
The Old Testament was delivered exclusively to the people of Israel, not to the Jews. There were NO JEWS in the Egyptian captivity. There were NO JEWS in the Assyrian Captivity. There were NO JEWS in the Babylonian Captivity. There were NO JEWS at Mt. Sinai. There were NO JEWS among the Twelve Tribes of Israel. Adam was not a Jew. Enoch was not a Jew. Noah was not a Jew. Shem was not a Jew. Abraham was not a Jew. Isaac was not a Jew. Jacob was not a Jew. But Esau, Jacob’s brother, became a Jew by lending his name to the race of people known as Edomites, who were of Hittite and Canaanite stock. Not even Judah was a Jew. No Judahite was ever referred to as a "Jew." Throughout their entire Old Testament history, the House of Judah and the Tribe of Judah were simply called "Judah." They NEVER called themselves Jews. Just as the American Indians never referred to themselves as "Indians," the Judahites never referred to themselves as "Jews." This is a modern interpolation imposed upon the Old Testament by those Edomites who are still today posing as Judah and Israel.
The modern definition of ‘Jew’ is presumed by most people to include their ancestry as the Tribe of Judah. Since that is a false assumption, it is entirely incorrect to apply the word ‘Jew’ to those Judahites who are falsely claimed as their ancestors.
Throughout Old Testament history, the Judahites and the Edomites were separate, warring nations. Then, during the latter part of the intertestamental period, from about 300 to 150 BC, a period which included the blaspheming of the Second Temple by the Greeks, the nation of Judah gradually became known as "Judea." The reason for this name change is very simple. It came as a result of the merging of two separate and distinct nations into one shaky and corrupt political unit. As one of my correspondents has referred to it, it was a "shotgun wedding," and an interracial one, to boot! Josephus, the Judahite historian of our people Israel, tells the story in great detail. (As part of this historical Jewish deception, his books have been mistitled The Antiquities of the Jews and the Wars of the Jews. The real titles should be The Antiquities of Judah and the Wars of Judah.) The fact that the entire world of Christian scholarship considers Josephus to be "a Jew" is a triumph for rabbinical Jewry. The Jews must promote the false equation, Jew = Judahite, in every document, on every page and in every title. If they do not, Joe Christian might get suspicious!!
In the Antiquities of Judah, at Chapter V, Paragraph 2, Josephus, the JUDAHITE historian, tells us this about the time period of the Roman occupation: "wherefore there are but two tribes in Asia and Europe subject to the Romans while the ten tribes are beyond Euphrates till now, and are an immense multitude, and not to be estimated by numbers." The two tribes are, of course, Judah and Benjamin, while the ten not subject to the Romans are also in Asia and Europe, but out of the Roman sphere of influence. The Asian Tribes (meaning those who resided in Asia Minor, equivalent to Turkey today), by that time, were thoroughly Hellenized. They all spoke Greek and most were in danger of being Romanized as Judea was being Romanized. These Israelites had grown to such an immense multitude that their numbers could not be estimated. Indeed, the population of both European and "Asian" Israelites had grown into the millions; and they all eventually became known as the Caucasians!
An Essay on the Proper Usage of the Word ‘Jew’
By Pastor Eli James
The Nature of the Problem
Christian Israel has a problem. The problem is one of Identity. For those who are new to this message, it is clear to us that the Jewish people are impostors to the claim of being Israel. Of this there is no doubt. The problem is who exactly is a Jew and how do we define the word ‘Jew’ so as to include the correct categories of people and to exclude the wrong categories of people.
Our problem is twofold: First is the problem of definition. The second is the problem of perception. We need to get clear on what the definition is and then we need to understand how perceptions have blurred or obscured the proper definition. Only a thorough analysis of the historical, racial and religious differences between Judahites versus Jews and, also, Israelites versus Jews can give us the answer. The novice will say that there is no difference between Jews and Israelites. That is the opinion of the parrot that has been trained by the rabbis and the Judeo-Christian Pharisees, such as Falwell, Hagee, Robertson and others, who teach lies and who make a living by blurring true distinctions so that criminals can pose as saints.
The point of this essay will be to suggest a proper usage of the word ‘Jew’ which accurately distinguishes between what they say they are and what they truly are. For example, the Jews say they are "Semites," but they have falsely labeled themselves as such, while the real Shemites, the Anglo-Saxon, Celtic and Caucasians of the European Dispersion, do not even realize that they are Shemites. One of our problems is that the Jews themselves are evasive and elusive about who or what a Jew is. Some say a Jew is a member of a particular race, namely, that of Shem. But this suggestion is easily disproven by two racial facts: 1.) Jews are virtually all of mixed race, especially the Ashkenazi Jews who actually have no Shemitic blood in them at all; and 2.) there are many other ethnic groups, such as Arabs, Palestinians, Turks, etc., who, like the Jewish people, are of partially Shemitic heritage. Many of these groups actually have more Shemitic blood in their veins than do the Jews. The only point of agreement among Jews here is that one must have a Jewish mother in order to be born a Jew, but that begs the question of her racial origins as well. Few Christians bother to point out that there is a major discrepancy between this Jewish maternal rule and the Biblical reckoning of lineage through the father. Where is the Scripture that allows this change in doctrine?
Now, since the Jewish claim to the land of Palestine is based on their supposed "Semitic" heritage, then virtually all the peoples of the Middle East have just as much right to Palestine as they do. If, on the other hand, the Jewish claim on Palestine is due to their supposed stewardship of the Bible, then the Jews are equally unacceptable because the Jewish people, despite their claims, have NEVER practiced the laws of the Bible. They have always practiced their own version of Scripture. It is today known as the Talmud. The rabbis make no distinction between the Torah (the Law and History Books of Moses) and the Talmud (rabbinical commentaries that carry as much or more weight for Jews than the writings of Moses). Few Christians are even aware of the Talmud and the Talmud’s frequent contradiction of the Mosaic Law.
Some Jews say that to be Jewish you only have to belong to or ascribe to a certain religious point of view: Judaism. But there are Orthodox, Conservative, Liberal, Hasidic, and other types of religious Jews who disagree among themselves what constitutes a religious Jew. Others say that you can be a "spiritual Jew" by merely sympathizing with whatever a particular Jew says. As can be seen, there is no real agreement even among Jews as to what the definition of the Jew is. But this vagueness is a deliberate tactic employed by the rabbis so that they can be evasive about their origins and still claim to possess the heritage of Israel and Judah.
But rather than try to sort through what the Jews say about themselves, there is a much easier way to determine what a Jew is; and that is by comparing the Jewish people, both in terms of their racial make-up and their religious beliefs, to the Judahites of Scripture. What we will discover is that the Jews have deliberately obfuscated their racial and religious origins in order to impersonate the REAL Judahites and the REAL Israelites of Scripture. That they have succeeded in fooling the entire world into believing that they are the People of the Book is the fulfillment of the prophecy in the Book of Revelation that says they are "the beast that deceiveth the whole world." (Rev. 12:9) Also, Rev. 2:9 and 3:9, properly translated, reveal that there is an active impersonation going on. Those passages should read "those who say they are Judah but are not." Has there ever been anyone out there saying "I’m a Jew" who really isn’t? The fact is that non-Jews, except for Hollywood actors looking for work, have no desire whatsoever to call themselves "Jews." No one is trying to impersonate a Jew. It’s the Jews who are impersonating Judah.
We all have heard stories about identity theft; and these stories always involve a crook stealing the identity of another individual. This is an easy thing to do these days. It is incomprehensible to most Bible students that one people can impersonate another people, but this is exactly what the Jews have done. They have successfully passed themselves off as Israelites and Judahites when they are really the Synagogue of Satan, i.e., "wolves in sheep’s clothing".
Before proceeding with the Biblical analysis of the word ‘Jew,’ it is important that we state a modern definition of Jewry, so that we have a basis of comparison between who and what the Jews are today versus what they claim to have been. My argument is that the Jewish people have not changed at all since the days of the Scribes and Pharisees. This is saying a lot, because I believe it is true that the Jewish people, of all races and cultures on the face of the earth, have not evolved one iota in the last two thousand years. They are today just as barbaric a people as they were then; and I’m NOT referring to the people of the House of Judah nor the people of the House of Israel. These latter two groups have indeed evolved greatly, having been a blessing to all the world, with our technological inventions, agriculture, science, art, medicine, sanitation, architecture, music and religion. I am, of course, referring to Anglo-Saxon Israel, the True and Only descendants of the Twelve Tribes of Israel, which EXCLUDES the impostor Jews, who were never of either House, although they claim to be. But if you expect anything other than lies from the synagogue of Satan, then you will be fooled indeed.
I think a modern, fair and accurate definition of ‘Jew’ is this: "A person who is a member of the ethnic group whose religion is Judaism." Of course, this definition leaves open whether the individual is religiously pious or atheistic. The key to understanding who a Jew is is to understand their intense ethnic exclusiveness/chauvinism based on 1.) their religion and 2.) their self-perception as an exclusive group. In addition, the popular perception is that the Jews are of Judah and Israel. That is a false perception. That is why I did not include it in the definition. Somehow, our language must be made to conform to reality. This means that we must disabuse ourselves of the traditional association between Jewry and Judah. We must stop thinking as the rabbis have programmed us to think. We need to come up with our own language and our own definitions of words that conform to reality. Accomplishing this will get us out from under the psychological yoke that Esau/Jewry has imposed upon us as prophesied by Isaac in Gen. 27:40. As Jacob posed as Esau before Isaac, Esau is today posing as Jacob. As long as Esau gets away with posing as Judah and Israel, the world is under their spell. As my colleague Arnold Kennedy put it: "Our enemies are determined to continue with the greatest hoax of identity fraud in history." This spell must be broken.
Words As Weapons
Just because a word is seen in Scripture does not mean that it belongs there. There are other words, such as ‘Gentile,’ that don’t belong in Scripture either. It has been in the interest of Jewry to invent and use these words in order to convey the impression that the Bible is about them when, in fact, they are not God’s chosen people at all. Strong’s Concordance carries out this mythology by providing us with Jewish definitions of certain words. These Jewish definitions of words must be exposed as self-serving attempts to cloud the racially exclusive message of the Bible, namely, that the Bible is to, for, by and about only True Israel. The Law and the Covenants were given exclusively to Israel, not to the Jews. And the Covenants were never transferred from Israel to "the Church," as the Dispensationalists claim. The Covenants were never given to anyone but Israel. The Bible says that Israel would be known by a "new name" and that we would be Yahweh’s witnesses. The Jews have come to witness only for themselves, as their Talmud and their Mishnah attest. It is only White Christian Israel that has witnessed the Scriptures to the world. We are the ones who printed the Bible in over four hundred languages and preached the Gospel, both Old and New Testaments, to the world. The Jews have done no such thing. The extent of their teaching is that they claim that the Torah was delivered to them for safekeeping; but they have not done that either. They have tampered with it and they have defiled it. Jewish teaching on Scripture is a carefully guarded secret except for their self-praising soundbytes of false information. To find out what their religion actually teaches, you have to read the Talmud, which is their substitute for the Bible.
When was the first or the last time you heard a rabbi expounding on Scripture for the benefit of the masses? When have you ever heard a rabbi teaching the world about the Covenants made exclusively to Israel? It has never happened. They have NOT been God’s witnesses. By their fruits, they actually witness for another god entirely. They cannot afford to go into Biblical expositions because there is so little about them in Scripture, unless, of course, you start to study Esau. In fact, the rabbis have ceased general proselytizing for fear that too many non-Jews will wake up to their charade. Hence, the numbers of Jews have remained small because you can only entrust so many people with such gigantic lies. The few Jews (Koestler, Lilienthal, Freedman, f*gan, Roth, Bernstein, and others) who speak the truth about the Jewish Impersonation of Israel routinely get shouted down, excommunicated or liquidated.
One of the words the Jews use as a weapon against us is ‘nation.’ In the Hebrew, it comes from the word ‘goy.’ In the Greek, it comes from the word ‘ethnos’ and from the word ‘Hellene.’ The rabbis of Judaism have conditioned us to use the word ‘goyim’ to mean "non-Jews." This is an ABSOLUTELY FALSE definition, even though that’s how Strong’s Concordance defines it.
If the word ‘goyim’ means "non-Jews," then how do you explain Gen. 17:5? It says,
"Neither shall thy name be anymore called Abram, but thy name shall be Abraham; for a father of many nations have I made thee."
Now, the word here translated as "nations" is ‘goyim.’ As such it is correctly translated. But let’s apply the Jewish definition of the word and see how senseless their definition really is!
"for a father of many non-Jews have I made thee."
By selectively translating ‘goyim’ as either "nations" or "non-Jews," the rabbis of deception accomplish their Babylonian purpose: confusion. By their own self-serving definition, which suits them well in most cases where they wish to impersonate Israel, in this case it fails to include Jews as being among the nations of Abraham!!!! This is an oversight that their deception has failed to take note of. And this is why the verse is correctly translated in the KJV. Since Abraham was not a Jew in the first place, and since the Ishmaelites, Brahmins, Israelites and Saxons came from his loins, he was indeed, "the father of many nations." And, indeed, these are all "non-Jewish" nations. But is this what they want the Bible to say? Clearly, their definition of ‘goyim’ is ridiculous. The correct translation of ‘goyim’ is "nations." And, depending upon the context of the specific verse, ‘goyim’ can refer to Israelite nations or non-Israelite nations. By paying James Strong to redefine ‘goyim’ as meaning "non-Jewish," they have tampered with Scripture in order to promote themselves as the people of the Book.
To suit their own aims, they have inserted ‘non-Jews’ in place of ‘goyim;’ and this is a major deception.
Another word they use to fool us is ‘Gentiles.’
For the word ‘Gentile’ (from the Greek #1672), here is what Strong would have us believe: "… a Hellen (Grecian) or inhabitant of Hellas; by extension a Greek-speaking person, especially a non-Jew: -- Gentile, Greek."
Now, I contend that this word, ‘Gentile,’ is another candidate for the scrapheap, because it simply does not mean what the Jews or their apologists say it means. That fact is that most of the Greek-speaking world at the time of the writing of the New Testament were the Israelites of the Dispersion. As I was researching my book, The Great Inpersonation, I opened the Book of James, reading it with a critical eye for the first time. My jaw dropped! I even cried because I realized the significance of it right away. The Book of James opens with this statement: "To the Twelve Tribes scattered abroad, greetings."
Strong’s definition of ‘Gentile’ gives us the same logical problem as the word ‘goyim.’ Because Israelites and Jews have been falsely equated in our minds, a rabbi or a Judeo-Christian would insist that these "Greeks" are non-Israelite "Gentiles"! But the Apostle James clearly addresses them as the Twelve Tribes! There is no mistake in the Book of James. There were no Jews among those Dispersed Tribes, only Israelites! The mistake is in the false equation! – and in the false definitions! The fact is that the word ‘Gentiles’ rarely refers to non-Israelites. The word ‘Gentile’ really means – are you ready, folks? – a RACE, or a TRIBE. This is from the Greek word, ‘ethnos.’ (Strong’s 1484.) For this word, Strong pulls the same nonsense, adding interpolations such as "…specifically a foreign (non-Jewish) one (usually by implication pagan): -- Gentile, heathen, nation, people."
Ladies and gentlemen, Strong has done an abominably dirty deed. He has replaced antonyms for synonyms, opposites for equalities. This is deception, plain and simple. It’s the Jews who are, in fact, the heathen and the pagans, for they are history’s most blatant impostors to the name of Israel! By juxtaposing the word ‘Jew’ with ‘Israel’ and ‘Judah,’ and by likewise suggesting that ‘heathen’ and ‘pagan’ are the opposite of ‘Jew,’ the world has been quite thoroughly deceived! [By the way, it has come to my attention that the more recent printings of Strong’s Concordance differ from my old, 1970’s edition. There is no doubt in my mind that the newer versions have even more pro-Jewish interpolations than the older ones. It is possible that James Strong did not author these interpolations at all. Later editors could have inserted these pro-Jewish notes. The Jews are constantly rewriting history to praise themselves and to make Christendom look shallow.]
If you will simply read your Bible, you will find that ‘ethnos,’ depending upon the context, can mean an Israelite nation, a non-Israelite nation, or both lumped together, as in all nations. It NEVER has the specific meaning of "non-Jewish." That is a BOLD-FACED LIE! It is a Satanic interpolation of the most clever kind! Strong’s first two definitions, namely "race" and "tribe," are the correct definitions. All the Jew-business added afterwards is trickery. Again, organized Christian scholarship is either in complete ignorance of this fact or they are accepting payment for shoveling this lie around like so much pig manure! These pulpitmasters should be wearing dungarees, folks! – and their props should be pitchforks, not Bibles and podiums, for all the truth you are getting from them!
There is something wrong with the definition, especially the part that gratuitously adds "especially a non-Jew." That part of the definition is an interpolation, that is, a Satanically-inspired, Jewish lie! It is not true that all "Gentiles" are non-Israelites. It is true, however, that almost all Israelites are non-Jews! So, Strong and the Jews have shot themselves in the foot again, because when the New Testament refers to the Gentiles of the Dispersion, it is most definitely referring to non-Jewish Israelites! Of course, no rabbi will admit that there is such a thing. They have taught for centuries that the House of Israel, i.e., the "lost Ten Tribes," have totally disappeared from the pages of history, never to be found again.
Au contraire! Pardon my French! Add another false teaching to their list of thousands upon thousands of lies! Truly, Judaism is the religion of lies, and Jewry is the Synagogue of Satan, for by their simple use of deceptive words, they have almost managed to destroy the True Israel of Scripture! Truly did Hosea say, "My people are destroyed for lack of knowledge." (Hos. 4:6)
Dispensationalism and Replacement Theology
One of the most common mistakes of Judeo-Christianity is the doctrine called Dispensationalism. Dispensationalism teaches that the Jewish people, by having rejected the Messiah, forfeited their right to the New Covenant and, as a result, the New Covenant was given to the "Gentile" (meaning "non-Jewish," of course) Christian Church instead. So, they refer to the Old Testament as the "Jewish Dispensation" and the New Testament as the "Church Dispensation."
This doctrine is completely unscriptural nonsense. There is not a single thread of truth contained in it. Even most Jews reject this theory, calling it "Replacement Theology," because it dictates that the Jewish people were replaced by the Church. Well, both groups are completely wrong because the Jewish people never were, are not now, and never will be Israel. Their heritage is distinctly Edomite, not Judahite. Since the Jewish claim to the name of Israel is a historical lie, they were never the people of the Covenant. Having never possessed the Covenant, how can the Covenant be transmitted from them to some church?
The truth is that True Israel, the Anglo-Saxon, Celtic and Caucasian peoples of this planet, ARE the Covenant People. The Law and the Covenants were delivered EXCLUSIVELY to us and to NO ONE ELSE. Thus, we have always possessed the Covenants and we never gave them to the Jews or to some church, although the Jews are doing their best to get us to GIVE AWAY OUR INHERITANCE. If we are stupid enough to do this, then the Jews deserve it.
The Old Testament was delivered exclusively to the people of Israel, not to the Jews. There were NO JEWS in the Egyptian captivity. There were NO JEWS in the Assyrian Captivity. There were NO JEWS in the Babylonian Captivity. There were NO JEWS at Mt. Sinai. There were NO JEWS among the Twelve Tribes of Israel. Adam was not a Jew. Enoch was not a Jew. Noah was not a Jew. Shem was not a Jew. Abraham was not a Jew. Isaac was not a Jew. Jacob was not a Jew. But Esau, Jacob’s brother, became a Jew by lending his name to the race of people known as Edomites, who were of Hittite and Canaanite stock. Not even Judah was a Jew. No Judahite was ever referred to as a "Jew." Throughout their entire Old Testament history, the House of Judah and the Tribe of Judah were simply called "Judah." They NEVER called themselves Jews. Just as the American Indians never referred to themselves as "Indians," the Judahites never referred to themselves as "Jews." This is a modern interpolation imposed upon the Old Testament by those Edomites who are still today posing as Judah and Israel.
The modern definition of ‘Jew’ is presumed by most people to include their ancestry as the Tribe of Judah. Since that is a false assumption, it is entirely incorrect to apply the word ‘Jew’ to those Judahites who are falsely claimed as their ancestors.
Throughout Old Testament history, the Judahites and the Edomites were separate, warring nations. Then, during the latter part of the intertestamental period, from about 300 to 150 BC, a period which included the blaspheming of the Second Temple by the Greeks, the nation of Judah gradually became known as "Judea." The reason for this name change is very simple. It came as a result of the merging of two separate and distinct nations into one shaky and corrupt political unit. As one of my correspondents has referred to it, it was a "shotgun wedding," and an interracial one, to boot! Josephus, the Judahite historian of our people Israel, tells the story in great detail. (As part of this historical Jewish deception, his books have been mistitled The Antiquities of the Jews and the Wars of the Jews. The real titles should be The Antiquities of Judah and the Wars of Judah.) The fact that the entire world of Christian scholarship considers Josephus to be "a Jew" is a triumph for rabbinical Jewry. The Jews must promote the false equation, Jew = Judahite, in every document, on every page and in every title. If they do not, Joe Christian might get suspicious!!
In the Antiquities of Judah, at Chapter V, Paragraph 2, Josephus, the JUDAHITE historian, tells us this about the time period of the Roman occupation: "wherefore there are but two tribes in Asia and Europe subject to the Romans while the ten tribes are beyond Euphrates till now, and are an immense multitude, and not to be estimated by numbers." The two tribes are, of course, Judah and Benjamin, while the ten not subject to the Romans are also in Asia and Europe, but out of the Roman sphere of influence. The Asian Tribes (meaning those who resided in Asia Minor, equivalent to Turkey today), by that time, were thoroughly Hellenized. They all spoke Greek and most were in danger of being Romanized as Judea was being Romanized. These Israelites had grown to such an immense multitude that their numbers could not be estimated. Indeed, the population of both European and "Asian" Israelites had grown into the millions; and they all eventually became known as the Caucasians!